I found a possible solution to my plotting issue at this post: Split conditional_effects plot in facets according to the value of the categorical DV
However I am still curious about the effect these different scale ranges may have on the models. Should I be building separate models for the separate response scales?
Additionally, I also realized that the code I provided results in many divergent transitions. Here is the new code that works for me using a cumulative model instead:
prior<-get_prior(formula = value ~ 1 + allowed_vote + (1|Participant) + (1|variable),
data = data,
family = cumulative("probit"))
fit_G1 <- brm(
formula = value ~ 1 + allowed_vote + (1|Participant) + (1|variable),
data = data,
family = cumulative("probit"),
prior = prior,
save_all_pars = TRUE,
control = list(adapt_delta = 0.95)
)
fit_G3<-brm(
formula = bf(value ~ 1 + allowed_vote + (1|Participant) + (1|variable))+
lf(disc ~ 0 + allowed_vote, cmc = FALSE),
data = long_Agency_SC,
family = cumulative("probit"),
save_all_pars = TRUE,
prior = prior_unequalVar,
control = list(adapt_delta = 0.85)
)
- Disclaimer: please feel free to correct any incorrect assumptions I am making as I am definitely not an expert in Bayesian statistics.
Thank you so much!