I might be deeply wrong about this, and misunderstand something about the topic. But here are the joint distributions I get from just using both approaches (with a big lambda_common = 4, and lambda1, lambda2 = 1.2, 0.9). The left-side approach considers that the common goals would be same for any given match (which is how I understand the correlation between the home/away goals). It is my understanding that the right-side approach (original approach from this topic) ignores the correlation. I found the correlation essential for football modeling. I don’t think the common lambda is even identifiable without it (well, maybe as an intercept). I probably have misunderstood the code or the approach of the topic, but those are two very different distributions.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How to calculate log_lik in generated quantities of two different process(models) running simultaneously in a longitudinal data | 12 | 757 | April 18, 2024 | |
| Help calculating log-likelihood with binomial_logit_glm to use with loo | 22 | 1490 | August 3, 2022 | |
| Getting PSIS-LOO from joint models | 1 | 586 | January 17, 2018 | |
| Fit statistics — troubles calculating log likelihood? | 6 | 2151 | October 16, 2017 | |
| Loglikelihood in bivariate beta mixture model with copula | 5 | 211 | January 20, 2025 |
