Hi,
Does the absence of a function bernoulli_logit_glm_rng
imply that something like bernoulli_logit_rng
should be used for generated quantities?
Side note: Version 2.28 of the Stan Function Reference appears to have duplicate definitions of the bernoulli_logit_glm_lpmf
and bernoulli_logit_glm_lupmf
functions, here:
13.3 Bernoulli-logit generalized linear model (Logistic Regression) | Stan Functions Reference
Thanks!
1 Like
Yes, you probably need to use bernoulli_logit_rng
- it however appears the _rng
version exists in the math library - math/bernoulli_logit_glm_rng.hpp at 92075708b1d1796eb82e3b284cd11e544433518e · stan-dev/math · GitHub so it is probably a simple omission that it is not exposed.
Maybe @rok_cesnovar or @stevebronder would know who to ask about this?
1 Like
As far as I know there is no reason to not add it, so just oversight. Made an issue so that we don’t repeat that mistake: Expose bernoulli_logit_glm_rng · Issue #1031 · stan-dev/stanc3 · GitHub
Thanks for digging that up Martin!
1 Like