It isn’t, although those T[0, 1]; postfixes are unnecessary and slow things down. It is telling you that
which means it refers to the log-likelihood contribution of observation 1633, most likely due to A[1633] being undefined because L0[1633] is greater than Linf. The lower bound on Linf looks like it should be max(L0) rather than zero.
Also, the L ~ normal(mu, tau); is probably wrong because Stan parameterizes the normal distribution with a standard deviation, rather than a precision.
I know. If sigma is a standard deviation, then tau is a precision, so calling normal with the second argument being tau is wrong because normal is assuming it is a standard deviation.