Ok I see. Again, this was more to get an absolute index of “explanatory” power of the model and of its fixed effects in a way that it would be understandable to a frequentist reviewer or supervisor. But as you said, it might be worth to take the time explaining the core difference of the Bayesian framework rather than trying to mimic the frequentist approach. Thanks.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bayes_R2 and conditioning on random effects | 20 | 3940 | April 7, 2021 | |
| Can I obtain bayes_R2 for reach level using rstanarm? | 7 | 1398 | January 26, 2018 | |
| R-squared from rstan (and not rstanarm) | 5 | 1970 | March 18, 2025 | |
| R2 for Bayesian models v. Nakagawa delta method | 3 | 1035 | April 23, 2025 | |
| R2 vs bayes_R2 | 8 | 970 | January 25, 2020 |