Apologies if this topic is in the wrong place. I’ve been using a simple toy model to experiment with the rstan and loo packages (most current verison of each, as far as I’m aware), and I noticed what appears to be a discrepancy between the relative effective sample sizes I get from the summary meth…

Effective sample size discrepancy between loo and rstan packages

Max_Mantei December 29, 2018, 10:05am 3

Did you have a look at this thread?

Topic		Replies	Views
Effective sample size differs between rstan 2.18 and rstan 2.17.3 for same model object RStan	2	922	November 14, 2018
Getting warning with `loo` package regarding r_eff Modeling loo	5	2737	April 21, 2018
Error in loo::relative_eff( ) - Error in n_eff_vec/S : non-numeric argument to binary operator Modeling rstan , fitting-issues , loo	7	1219	May 13, 2020
LOO Model Comparison Alternative Modeling rstan , techniques , loo , cmdstanr	3	69	March 27, 2025
Get effective sample size Interfaces rstan	4	2562	November 13, 2018