I recently ran an introductory course for the Royal Statistical Society, which I did the last couple of years with rstan only, but now for the first time I offered a choice of rstan, pystan, cmdstanr or cmdstanpy. This gave me an opportunity to closely compare them. I offer up these pretty paltry ob…

[image] robertgrant: In general, I am annoyed by Python packages that are called x for pip install and then when you go to import them, they are suddenly called y. Like pystan. Maybe that’s just me, but every time I explain to learners that they have to look out for things like that, it deflates…

To continue hijacking this thread. [image] robertgrant: It’s a shame about Jupyter notebooks, pystan and nest-asyncio. I don’t know enough about the issue to comment. Maybe there’s a way to get around it. [image] ahartikainen: This is kind of a problem in Jupyter, which means it should b…

Thanks for the ideas. [image] ahartikainen: Currently both pystan and cmdstanpy has similar functions in the background (but they handle numpy arrays too), so there could a user facing function to use them. That would be really helpful for anyone who isn’t highly experienced with Python. I g…

[image] robertgrant: I still prefer compiling a sampler that contains a likelihood and a prior, and after compilation will take data, inits, seed, etc as input, but I can live with it. I also find the current pystan behavior absolutely confusing. I want to build the model, and then maybe set …

[image] Funko_Unko: I also find the current pystan behavior absolutely confusing. I want to build the model, and then maybe set the data that induce the posterior, but I don’t see how you can build a posterior. I completely agree. [image] ahartikainen: This was selected after long conver…

[image] RStan3 and PyStan3 Interface Developers We had an unusually productive discussion today on Stan 3, mostly from the perspective of RStan. You can install a somewhat working version of the provisional rstan3 package from GitHub with devtools::install_github("stan-de…

Ok, well, thanks. I guess I disagree with the outcome — users do, in fact, understand that the stan model program is separate from the specific data-set, and forcing those two things together as “build” breaks that mental model. The stan program is 100% independent of the values (but not the form) …

Just chiming in to point out that the {model + data} framework also kinda misfits in the context of SBC, which in turn is becoming more common/recommended for workflows.

[image] robertgrant: rstan and cmdstanr accept a list or a filename for data. Cmdstanpy and pystan want only a dictionary. Writing and reading from JSON in Python is a massive pain, at least in my experience, so it would be great if pystan and cmdstanpy took data files as an argument, and also o…

[image] robertgrant: Suppose you want 1000 warmup draws and then 1000 retained after that. rstan requires warmup=1000, iter=2000, while all the others will have some form of num_warmup=1000,num_sample=1000. That’s a potential trap for the unwary. +100 as the emoji goes @robertgrant : would …

Various observations on rstan, cmdstanr, pystan and cmdstanpy after teaching with all in parallel

Interfaces

ahartikainen July 19, 2021, 1:33pm 9

Topic		Replies	Views
CmdStanPy - ready for beta testing! Developers pystan	23	2430	August 6, 2019
RStan3 and PyStan3 Interface Developers	77	6515	July 16, 2017
RStan is slower than Pystan Interfaces	34	6842	March 2, 2018
How to use your own stan model -- full tutorial Modeling	15	4016	December 12, 2019
Modularity for making Stan more Pythonic and Rthonic Developers	54	3618	October 9, 2019

Various observations on rstan, cmdstanr, pystan and cmdstanpy after teaching with all in parallel

Related topics