@andre.pfeuffer after studying a bit the PIG distribution I have three questions:
- ======================================================
the PIG (poisson-inverse-gaussian) proposed by you has three parameters. The inverse gaussian (and therefore its mixture with poisson) has two parameters as far as I understand
Is your distribution possibly a (?):
- Sichel (or poisson-generalised-inverse-gaussian) distribution,
- zero adjusted (hurdle), or
- zero inflated versions of the Poisson-inverse Gaussian distribution
- ======================================================
If I want to create a generated quantities of the kind
x = GIG_rng(.., .., ..);
y = poisson_rng(x);
I need to know the correspondence between your implementation and the standard GIG parametrisation (assuming that you are using the generalised inverse gaussian)
Assuming that your PIG refers to the poisson-generalised-inverse-gaussian (having three parameters)
can I ask from what source this implementation has been taken?
Because a method for random numbers generator from GIG Generating Generalized Inverse Gaussian Random Variates — Vienna University of Economics and Business uses natural parameters (see Generalized inverse Gaussian distribution - Wikipedia for reference).
- ======================================================
Plotting NB vs. PIG I was able to see heavier tails right of PIG versus NB, nut thinner left tails. What am I missing?
library(gamlss.dist)
library(tidyverse)
rPIG(1000, mu = 500, sigma = 2) %>%
as_tibble() %>%
rename(PIG = value) %>%
bind_cols(
rZIPIG(1000, mu = 500, sigma = 2, nu = 0.3) %>%
as_tibble() %>%
rename(ZIPIG = value)
) %>%
bind_cols(
rnegbin(1000, mu = 500, theta = 1) %>%
as_tibble() %>%
rename(NB = value)
) %>%
gather(Distribution, `Generated samples`) %>%
ggplot(aes(`Generated samples` + 1, color = Distribution)) +
geom_vline(xintercept = 500, linetype = "dashed") +
geom_density() +
scale_x_log10()
Thanks!