Thanks @mitzimorris – my understanding is that \theta \times \sigma is basically a random effect specified via non-centred parametrisation, and as such it’s “soft” centred (correct me if I’m wrong). Based on my reading of this thread, I had understood that it was preferable for posterior-sampling efficiency gains to specify traditional random intercepts with the sum_to_zero formulation where possible. Did I get that wrong ? Thanks again.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proper use of sum_to_zero_vector in nested multilevel models | 17 | 653 | June 2, 2025 | |
| Sum to zero constraints and multi-level models - best practise/example code | 14 | 1122 | July 16, 2025 | |
| Penalizing parameter to enforce a sum to 0 constraint? | 13 | 760 | May 9, 2024 | |
| BYM2 with unstructured country random effect | 39 | 2901 | February 11, 2022 | |
| Correlated posterior - Sum to zero constraint for varying intercepts?! | 19 | 5264 | December 22, 2021 |