You can take the entire posterior distribution, or you can use the posterior distribution to make decisions, integrating a utility function over the posterior. But there’s no decision question for which the posterior 90% interval (of any sort) is the answer. This is not to say that posterior intervals are useless. It’s just to say that they are summaries to aid understanding, in the same way that graphs are summaries to aid understanding. Some graphs can be better than others, but it will depend on context. Similarly, there is no right or wrong way to define a posterior interval; what to do will depend on your communication goals.
andrewgelman
15
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shortest Posterior/HPD Intervals for Highly Skewed Distributions | 3 | 380 | June 28, 2024 | |
| How can I select a ROPE range for a logistic model based on odds ratios | 22 | 938 | March 28, 2025 | |
| Beta-release Bayesian Posterior Database | 21 | 2425 | December 14, 2019 | |
| SBC with histogram/ecdf vs treating credible intervals as confidence intervals | 6 | 1276 | March 9, 2022 | |
| Attaching labels estimating proportion of posterior density within a fixed interval in the ggdist package | 11 | 307 | May 15, 2025 |