Call for vote on Adjoint ODE Design Doc PR

Developers
2

I dunno how we’re doing the votes, but I’m in favor of this.

  1. There is a use case (this scales better with parameters)
  2. It seems like at least a couple people other than @wds15 were able to run this (see here)
  3. There’s no new software dependencies, so if we ever want to deprecate this interface, we just plug in another ODE solver behind the scenes for compatibility
  4. There’s a bunch of work to systemetize the ODE tests here, so if this thing can fit into that testing framework then I am less worried about maintenance (it’ll be going through the same basic tests as all the other solvers + whatever specialized one it needs)
1 Like