# Understanding LOOIC

**URL:** <https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/understanding-looic/13409>\
**Category:** Modeling\
**Tags:** loo, interpret-results, cognitive-science\
**Created:** [February 29, 2020, 12:51pm UTC](https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/understanding-looic/13409 "2020-02-29T12:51:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Longshot408](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/user_avatar/discourse.mc-stan.org/longshot408/32/6484_2.png) [@Longshot408](https://discourse.mc-stan.org/u/Longshot408)\
**Post date:** [February 29, 2020, 3:26pm UTC](https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/understanding-looic/13409/6 "2020-02-29T15:26:37Z")

</div>

> [@andre.pfeuffer](#):
>
> -1.9 / 0.3

Thanks so much! This provides lots of clarification. For future reference though, what if the difference was not 4-5 bigger? Say it was only twice as big…would that mean there is a negligible difference between the models?

And in general, can I think of this kind of like a Wald chi-square test for my models, or is that not really a correct interpretation?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.mc-stan.org/t/understanding-looic/13409)._
